|
Finale
May 14, 2013 21:45:44 GMT -5
Post by Amanda Kimmel on May 14, 2013 21:45:44 GMT -5
I think since Steph won immunity (as I expected), she's going to go after Pete. What this hinges on is the willingness of Gina and Morgan - two people who have proven themselves loyal to him - to vote him out, as opposed to each other.
Therefore, there are two scenarios, with multiple outcomes, that I see happening: 1) Steph convinces Gina and Morgan that Pete is the biggest threat left in the game, and they vote him out. Ending 1A) Steph wins the final immunity, takes Morgan to the end, and beats her 8-1 Ending 1B) Steph does not win the final immunity, and the other two vote her out and Gina wins the game
2) Steph is unable to convince Gina and Morgan that Pete is a threat, and they vote for each other. Steph votes for Gina, forcing a tiebreaker between the two. Ending 2A) Pete or the Gina/Morgan winner wins the final immunity challenge, votes out Steph, and Pete wins the game Ending 2B) Steph wins the final immunity challenge, votes out Pete, and wins the game
It looks like we have a good chance to get Steph or Pete as a winner, which would be great. Better than last season, at least - when we all knew that Cartis was winning from the final seven onward. Here... I haven't had the faintest clue at any time. My pick to win, though, is still Steph.
|
|
|
Finale
May 14, 2013 22:45:13 GMT -5
Post by Ted Rogers on May 14, 2013 22:45:13 GMT -5
Sounds very accurate, I just pray we do not see a Morgan-Gina F2, all that matters to me at this point.
|
|
|
Post by Roxy the Foxy on May 15, 2013 10:56:00 GMT -5
Curtis was a great winner
|
|
|
Finale
May 15, 2013 11:49:42 GMT -5
Post by Amanda Kimmel on May 15, 2013 11:49:42 GMT -5
Sounds very accurate, I just pray we do not see a Morgan-Gina F2, all that matters to me at this point. We would all hate to see that. Curtis was a great winner Did I say otherwise? He was a great winner, but he was an OBVIOUS winner. I was merely saying that this season was unpredictable, especially compared to last. Sorry if my wording was... lackluster. I think I took a sentence out, whoops.
|
|
|
Finale
May 15, 2013 15:04:27 GMT -5
Post by Ted Rogers on May 15, 2013 15:04:27 GMT -5
sorry guys Gsurv 1 sucked, this one was much better. Gsurv 1 was very much akin to "Redemption Island" Great and obvious winner, but extremely boring as everyone pretty much did nothing to try and change anything and just played along.
This season was kind of average before it merged but after that....HOLY SHIT!
|
|
|
Finale
May 16, 2013 3:27:11 GMT -5
Post by Artis Silvester on May 16, 2013 3:27:11 GMT -5
sorry guys Gsurv 1 sucked, this one was much better. Gsurv 1 was very much akin to "Redemption Island" Great and obvious winner, but extremely boring as everyone pretty much did nothing to try and change anything and just played along. Yeah it was very much like RI But boy did Ralph do great in the Nigger Debate challenge!
|
|
|
Finale
May 16, 2013 14:39:00 GMT -5
Post by Amanda Kimmel on May 16, 2013 14:39:00 GMT -5
Who do you mean by Ralph here? Vernon?
|
|
|
Finale
May 16, 2013 17:58:40 GMT -5
Post by Amanda Kimmel on May 16, 2013 17:58:40 GMT -5
...is this jury watching the same game as us? Gina isn't even getting an AS spot. If she wins, she gets FvF and ONLY that. She doesn't even deserve AS! Why do they plan on voting for her to win?
...this makes zero sense :/
|
|
|
Finale
May 16, 2013 22:57:14 GMT -5
Post by Artis Silvester on May 16, 2013 22:57:14 GMT -5
Who do you mean by Ralph here? Vernon? Nevermind
|
|
|
Finale
May 18, 2013 22:09:35 GMT -5
Post by Amanda Kimmel on May 18, 2013 22:09:35 GMT -5
...it's the reverse, apparently. I am so confused by this. We'll see if Pete is lying to Gina - or not. I'm guessing he'll vote out the bigger threat to him... however he sees that.
|
|
|
Finale
May 20, 2013 9:32:16 GMT -5
Post by Ted Rogers on May 20, 2013 9:32:16 GMT -5
Gina's strategy is to show Pete's arrogant/bully side as much as possible by antagonizing him. She is playing this very smartly, though I do think Pete is poking holes in her gameplay, Gina was a lot more out of the loop than she lets on, and Pete didnt have as much power and control as he believes he did.
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Kimmel on May 20, 2013 9:43:43 GMT -5
Gina is indeed like Sandra in HvV. Pete is like Dawn in Caramoan.
Which one won and which one got 0 jury votes? Hmmm?
Biggest difference is Steph warning Morgan. Morgan was too stupid to believe it, as opposed to being too nice like Brenda. Morgan has no reason to be bitter because she should have seen it coming.
Pete is tearing Gina's game to shreds here, but alienating his own while doing it. Gina wants him to come across as Hantzlike and it's working. This is definitely All-star behavior on Gina's part. She gets in for sure after this. She has been playing to win... and we haven't seen it until now.
|
|
|
Finale
May 20, 2013 20:13:48 GMT -5
Post by Artis Silvester on May 20, 2013 20:13:48 GMT -5
PETE SHOULD WIN!
|
|
|
Finale
May 20, 2013 20:54:11 GMT -5
Post by Amanda Kimmel on May 20, 2013 20:54:11 GMT -5
He definitely played the better game. Very strategic and although mean at times, he managed to shun the target off of him on multiple occasions. However, at this FTC... Gina is taking it to him. Pete has proven that his understanding of others' games is inept, and that although he may have played better strategically, he's letting it get to his head. Gina is making him pay for that, and that will give her the win here.
|
|
|
Finale
May 20, 2013 21:42:11 GMT -5
Post by Ted Rogers on May 20, 2013 21:42:11 GMT -5
Pete is bombing this FTC sooooo hard lol
|
|